From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hyman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 25, 2010
73 A.D.3d 1211 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2002-05294.

May 25, 2010.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 7, 2005 ( People v Hyman, 15 AD3d 417), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 15, 2002.

Tullie Hyman, named herein as Tully Hyman, Napanoch, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M.Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Roni C. Piplani of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, RJ., Mastro, Rivera and Florio, JJ.


Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).


Summaries of

People v. Hyman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 25, 2010
73 A.D.3d 1211 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Hyman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TULLY HYMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 25, 2010

Citations

73 A.D.3d 1211 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 4615
900 N.Y.S.2d 918

Citing Cases

Hyman v. Brown

The state court rejected the claim on the merits. See People v. Hyman , 73 A.D.3d 1211, 900 N.Y.S.2d 918 (2d…

Hyman v. Brown

The Appellate Division denied relief, holding that appellate counsel was not ineffective. People v. Hyman, 73…