From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Huchital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 2005
22 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2003-04560.

October 17, 2005.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered April 23, 2002, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Mathew B. Tully, Albany, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (David R. Huey of counsel), for respondent.

Before: H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Spolzino, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's argument that the County Court failed to conduct an adequate plea allocution is not preserved for appellate review ( see People v. Toxey, 86 NY2d 725; People v. Eaton, 14 AD3d 577), and this is not a "rare case" presenting an exception to the preservation requirement ( People v. Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666; see People v. Harrell, 288 AD2d 489).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Huchital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 2005
22 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Huchital

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANDREW HUCHITAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 17, 2005

Citations

22 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 7706
801 N.Y.S.2d 909

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

The defendant's contention that the plea allocution was factually insufficient to establish the crime of…

People v. Smith

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Having failed to move to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing, the…