From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hoffman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 2011
84 A.D.3d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-05845.

May 10, 2011.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed May 26, 2010, which, upon his conviction of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (three counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, imposed a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed on June 25, 2002.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Ellen Fried of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and William H. Branigan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Hall, JJ.


Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally-imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law ( see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621).

A court to which a matter has been remitted for resentencing solely for the purpose of imposing a required term of postrelease supervision does not have the authority to consider whether to reduce the defendant's sentence as a whole ( id.).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Hoffman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 2011
84 A.D.3d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Hoffman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CORNEL HOFFMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 2011

Citations

84 A.D.3d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 4070
925 N.Y.S.2d 511

Citing Cases

People v. Lopez

At that time, however, the Supreme Court failed to impose the statutorily required period of postrelease…

People v. Latimer

The defendant's contention that Penal Law § 70.85 is unconstitutional because it deprives him of his right to…