From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hodge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 1994
207 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 19, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Delury, J.).


Ordered that the sentence is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, to give the defendant the opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea.


The transcript of the defendant's plea proceeding does not indicate that the defendant was told that if he failed to appear for sentencing the court could impose a harsher sentence than the one that was promised. Accordingly, even though the defendant failed to appear for sentencing, the court could not impose a sentence greater than that for which he had bargained without first affording the defendant an opportunity to withdraw his plea and stand trial (see, People v. Elliot, 204 A.D.2d 565; People v Moreno, 196 A.D.2d 850; People v. Annunziata, 105 A.D.2d 709).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit (cf., People v. Sanchez, 65 N.Y.2d 436, 444). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hodge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 1994
207 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Hodge

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERALD HODGE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 19, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 978

Citing Cases

People v. Stewart

The County Court imposed an enhanced sentence based on the fact that the defendant was arrested on unrelated…

People v. Rutigliano

The record of the defendant's plea proceeding does not substantiate the People's assertion that the defendant…