From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hicks

Supreme Court of California
Mar 23, 2016
200 Cal. Rptr. 3d 7 (Cal. 2016)

Opinion

No. S232218.

03-23-2016

PEOPLE v. HICKS.


Opinion

The petition for review is granted. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to whether the trial court erred when it refused to inform the jury at the retrial of a murder charge that defendant had been convicted of gross vehicular manslaughter in the first trial. (Compare People v. Batchelor (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 1102, 178 Cal.Rptr.3d 28.) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.516(a)(1).)

KRUGER, J., was absent and did not participate.

CANTIL–SAKAUYE, C.J., WERDEGAR, CHIN, CORRIGAN, LIU, and CUÉLLAR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hicks

Supreme Court of California
Mar 23, 2016
200 Cal. Rptr. 3d 7 (Cal. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Hicks

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. HICKS.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 23, 2016

Citations

200 Cal. Rptr. 3d 7 (Cal. 2016)
367 P.3d 6

Citing Cases

People v. Johnson

Whether this position has merit is a matter that will ultimately be decided by the California Supreme Court;…