From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 2001
288 A.D.2d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2000-08966

Submitted November 1, 2001.

November 26, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McDonald, J.), rendered August 25, 2000, convicting him of assault in the first degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Mina Q. Malik of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to disprove the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15). The defendant does not dispute that he stabbed the complainant and slashed the right side of his face. The only issue was whether the defendant acted with justification. On appeal, the defendant contends that the testimony of the complainant and two eyewitnesses were unworthy of belief. However, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 94). Its determination should be afforded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless it is unsupported by the record (see, People v. Martinez, 210 A.D.2d 508). Based on the evidence adduced at trial, we discern no basis to disturb the jury's resolution of the credibility issue and its rejection of the defendant's justification defense.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

S. MILLER, J.P., LUCIANO, SCHMIDT and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 2001
288 A.D.2d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. JOSE HERNANDEZ, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 886

Citing Cases

People v. Turner

MEMORANDUM:Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, criminal…

People v. Wilt

Defendant first contends that the trial evidence was legally insufficient to disprove his defense of…