From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 1988
140 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Summary

concluding that defendant made out prima facie Batson claim, but that prosecutor offered adequate race-neutral justifications for his peremptory challenges to rebut inference of discrimination

Summary of this case from Grate v. Stinson

Opinion

May 16, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Beldock, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant, who is Hispanic, claims that the prosecutor used his peremptory challenges to exclude from the jury all panel members with Hispanic surnames, thereby violating the defendant's equal protection rights (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79; People v Scott, 70 N.Y.2d 420). Although the ethnicity of one challenged juror is not certain, the record reveals that the prosecutor did in fact peremptorily challenge the only three prospective jurors who definitely had Hispanic surnames. Therefore the defendant has made out a prima facie case of discrimination (see, Batson v Kentucky, supra, at 96; People v Scott, supra, at 423). However, as to all the challenged jurors the prosecutor came forward with race-neutral explanations for his challenges sufficient to rebut the defendant's prima facie showing (see, Batson v Kentucky, supra, at 96-97). Two of the jurors were dismissed because they had close relatives who had been prosecuted by the District Attorney's office and there was a question as to their impartiality. The remaining two jurors, including the one whose Hispanic origin was questionable, were challenged because they both spoke Spanish and indicated during the voir dire that they might have difficulty accepting as final and authoritative the court interpreter's translation of the testimony. Although these explanations may not have risen to the level of those needed to justify a challenge for cause, they were sufficient to satisfy the prosecutor's burden to come forward with nondiscriminatory reasons for his challenges (see, Batson v Kentucky, supra, at 97; People v Baysden, 128 A.D.2d 795, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 798; People v Cartagena, 128 A.D.2d 797, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 798). Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 1988
140 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

concluding that defendant made out prima facie Batson claim, but that prosecutor offered adequate race-neutral justifications for his peremptory challenges to rebut inference of discrimination

Summary of this case from Grate v. Stinson
Case details for

People v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DIONISIO HERNANDEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 16, 1988

Citations

140 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Sosa v. State

I dissent from the holding of the majority, because I believe that Batson does apply to Hispanics. United…

People v. Owens

Further, the court did not err in rejecting defendant's contention that the prosecution's exercise of a…