From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hendrix

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 23, 1978
44 N.Y.2d 658 (N.Y. 1978)

Opinion

Argued February 10, 1978

Decided March 23, 1978

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN J.J. JONES, J.

Anna M. Perry, John F. Middlemiss, Jr., and Leon J. Kesner for appellant.

Patrick Henry, District Attorney (Daniel J. Murphy of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

While the trial court erred in allowing the officer to testify as to the former codefendant's extrajudicial statements, which inculpated defendant, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in view of the overwhelming proof of guilt. (People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230.) As to the trial court's denial of defendant's pretrial motion to preclude cross-examination regarding recent convictions for robbery and possession of stolen property, it cannot be said that the court abused its discretion. (People v Schwartzman, 24 N.Y.2d 241.)

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Hendrix

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 23, 1978
44 N.Y.2d 658 (N.Y. 1978)
Case details for

People v. Hendrix

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ELROY HENDRIX, Also…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 23, 1978

Citations

44 N.Y.2d 658 (N.Y. 1978)
405 N.Y.S.2d 31
376 N.E.2d 192

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

These cases stand for the proposition that there cannot be an attempt to commit a crime which is in itself a…

People v. Thompson

The record indicates that the trial court weighed the competing factors when it limited inquiry on…