From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Henderson

Supreme Court of California.
Dec 23, 2020
272 Cal. Rptr. 3d 812 (Cal. 2020)

Opinion

S265172

12-23-2020

PEOPLE v. HENDERSON


The petition for review is granted. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Does the Three Strikes law ( Pen. Code, §§ 667, subd. (c)(6) & (7), 1170.12, subd. (a)(6) & (7) ) require consecutive terms on multiple current violent or serious felony convictions, regardless of whether the offenses occurred on the same occasion or arose from the same set of operative facts?

Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, Kruger, Groban and Jenkins, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Henderson

Supreme Court of California.
Dec 23, 2020
272 Cal. Rptr. 3d 812 (Cal. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. HENDERSON

Court:Supreme Court of California.

Date published: Dec 23, 2020

Citations

272 Cal. Rptr. 3d 812 (Cal. 2020)
477 P.3d 537

Citing Cases

People v. Phouamkha

The issue of whether the Three Strikes law requires consecutive terms on multiple current violent or serious…

People v. Loftis

(People v. Henderson (2020) 272 Cal.Rptr.3d 812…