From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hartman

Supreme Court of California
Aug 12, 1881
62 Cal. 562 (Cal. 1881)

Opinion

         Appeal from a judgment of conviction, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Rolfe, J.

         COUNSEL

          A. B. Paris, Satterwhite & Curtis, for Appellant.

          A. L. Hart, Attorney General, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         In Bank. The Court:

         The appellant was indicted for the crime of grand larceny, and on the trial the District Attorney was permitted, against the objection of defendant, to introduce evidence tending to show that the defendant had at another time stolen other property than that described in the indictment. This was error. (Walker v. Commonwealth, 1 Leigh, 574; State v. Daubert , 42 Mo. 242; State v. Goetz , 34 Mo. 85.)

         Judgment and order reversed.


Summaries of

People v. Hartman

Supreme Court of California
Aug 12, 1881
62 Cal. 562 (Cal. 1881)
Case details for

People v. Hartman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE v. H. HARTMAN

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Aug 12, 1881

Citations

62 Cal. 562 (Cal. 1881)

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

         The court erred in the admission of testimony in regard to the circumstances of the killing of the…

People v. Cunningham

" (Brown v. Commonwealth , 76 Pa. St. 337.)          The cases of People v. Hartman , 62 Cal. 562, and People…