From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harrison

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1916
219 N.Y. 562 (N.Y. 1916)

Summary

In People v. Harrison, 194 Mich. 363, 160 N.W. 623 (1916), in a criminal penalty described as "`a fine of not less than $50 nor more than $200 and the costs of his prosecution, and [emphasis supplied] to imprisonment in the county jail not less than twenty days nor more than six months, in the discretion of the court'", the word "and" was held to mean "or" as well as "and".

Summary of this case from Wright v. State

Opinion

Argued June 13, 1916

Decided October 24, 1916

Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General ( Edward G. Griffin of counsel), for appellant.

Arthur F. Driscoll for respondent.


Judgment affirmed on authority of People v. Ringe ( 197 N.Y. 143).

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK and HOGAN, JJ. Not voting: POUND, J.


Summaries of

People v. Harrison

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1916
219 N.Y. 562 (N.Y. 1916)

In People v. Harrison, 194 Mich. 363, 160 N.W. 623 (1916), in a criminal penalty described as "`a fine of not less than $50 nor more than $200 and the costs of his prosecution, and [emphasis supplied] to imprisonment in the county jail not less than twenty days nor more than six months, in the discretion of the court'", the word "and" was held to mean "or" as well as "and".

Summary of this case from Wright v. State
Case details for

People v. Harrison

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v . EDWARD J. HARRISON…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 24, 1916

Citations

219 N.Y. 562 (N.Y. 1916)
114 N.E. 1065

Citing Cases

Wright v. State

As said in Union Starch Refining Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 186 F.2d 1008, 27 A.L.R.2d 629 (7th…

State v. Abstracters Board of Examiners

Land surveying is completely and peculiarly analogous because the records are official, have evidentiary…