From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harris

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Feb 4, 2015
497 Mich. 958 (Mich. 2015)

Opinion

Docket Nos. 149872 149873 150042. COA Nos. 317158 317272 316072.

2015-02-4

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Sean HARRIS, Defendant–Appellant. People of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. William Little, Defendant–Appellant. People of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Nevin Hughes, Defendant–Appellant.


Prior report: 306 Mich.App. 116, 855 N.W.2d 209.

Order

On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the July 15, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered, and they are GRANTED. The parties shall address: (1) whether the Disclosures by Law Enforcement Officers Act, MCL 15.391, et seq., precludes the use of false statements by a law enforcement officer in a prosecution for obstruction of justice; and (2) whether the waivers signed by the defendants bar the use of their statements in a criminal prosecution as violative of state or federal rights against self-incrimination.

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. Motions for permission to file briefs amicus curiae and briefs amicus curiae regarding these cases should be filed in People v. Harris (Docket No. 149872) only.


Summaries of

People v. Harris

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Feb 4, 2015
497 Mich. 958 (Mich. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Sean HARRIS…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Feb 4, 2015

Citations

497 Mich. 958 (Mich. 2015)
858 N.W.2d 465

Citing Cases

People v. Harris

The Supreme Court granted defendants' applications for leave to appeal. People v Harris, 497 Mich 958 (2015).…

People v. Haris

Recognizing that the rights granted defendants by the Detroit Police Department in its advice-of-rights form…