From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hancock

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1874
48 Cal. 631 (Cal. 1874)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court, Eighteenth Judicial District, San Bernardino County.

         Action to recover a tax levied on an assessment of the Muscupiable Rancho, in San Bernardino County. The rancho contained twenty-four thousand six hundred and fifty-six acres, and the entire ranch, as a whole, was assessed at twenty-four thousand six hundred and fifty-six dollars. Two years before the assessment, the defendants, Hancock and Hays, had sold to A. J. Pope seven thousand four hundred and seventy-nine acres of the rancho by metes and bounds, leaving the defendants only seventeen thousand one hundred and seventy-seven acres. The answer alleged a fraudulent assessment. There was no evidence to show the value placed by the Assessor, on the seven thousand four hundred and seventy-nine acres sold. The Court below rendered judgment for the defendants, and the people appealed.

         COUNSEL

          John L. Love, Attorney-General, for the Appellant.

         C. G. W. French and Henry Hancock, in pro. per., for the Respondents.


         JUDGES: McKinstry, J. Neither Mr. Justice Crockett nor Mr. Justice Rhodes expressed an opinion.

         OPINION

          McKINSTRY, Judge

         The defendants answered and proved that a tract of land containing nearly one third of the larger tract described in the assessment had been by them sold and conveyed by deed, duly recorded, two years before the assessment was made. The Court below found that the assessment contained no data from which could be estimated what sum should be paid by the defendants, and properly gave judgment for the defendants.

         Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Hancock

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1874
48 Cal. 631 (Cal. 1874)
Case details for

People v. Hancock

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE v. JOHN HANCOCK and JOHN C. HAYS and the MUSCUPIABLE RANCHO

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1874

Citations

48 Cal. 631 (Cal. 1874)

Citing Cases

Grotefend v. Ultz

COUNSEL:          A.P. Catlin and J. T. Matlock, for Appellant, cited Political Code, secs. 3628, 3635, 3636,…