From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Guzman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 11, 2013
109 A.D.3d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-09-11

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Ricardo GUZMAN, appellant.

Ricardo Guzman, Coxsackie, N.Y., appellant pro se. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and *57Camille O'Hara Gillespie of counsel), for respondent.


Ricardo Guzman, Coxsackie, N.Y., appellant pro se. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and *57Camille O'Hara Gillespie of counsel), for respondent.
Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Erica Horwitz of counsel), former appellate counsel.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 28, 2004 ( People v. Guzman, 8 A.D.3d 677, 778 N.Y.S.2d 893), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 10, 2000.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987;People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883).

RIVERA, J.P., SKELOS, COHEN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Guzman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 11, 2013
109 A.D.3d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Guzman

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Ricardo GUZMAN, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 11, 2013

Citations

109 A.D.3d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 5835
971 N.Y.S.2d 56