From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Guzman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 6, 1998
254 A.D.2d 37 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 6, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Gross, J.).


The record, viewed in its entirety, establishes that defendant's plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary ( see People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536, 543) and not influenced by defendant's medication ( see, People v. Bermudez, 228 A.D.2d 237, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 919). Defendant received effective assistance of counsel ( see, People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397, 404), and defendant's meritless attacks on his counsel's performance, made before and after the plea, were insufficient to create an actual conflict of interest ( see, People v. Rodriguez, 251 A.D.2d 259). There was no need to appoint new counsel where the court denied defendant's motion to withdraw his plea without relying upon counsel's statements controverting defendant's claims of misconduct ( see, People v. Rodriguez, 189 A.D.2d 684, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 892).

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Guzman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 6, 1998
254 A.D.2d 37 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Guzman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ELIAS GUZMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 37 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 715

Citing Cases

Guzman v. Sabourin

The Appellate Division affirmed the conviction on October 6, 1998. People v. Guzman, 678 N.Y.S.2d 715…