Opinion
June 25, 1990
Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We do not agree with the defendant's contention that his written statement should have been suppressed pursuant to CPL 60.45 (2) (b) (i). The defendant agreed to accompany the investigating officer to police headquarters for questioning. The officer's statement to the defendant that he would return him home after questioning, did not create a substantial risk that the defendant might falsely incriminate himself (see, People v Taber, 115 A.D.2d 126), and in fact the defendant returned home after the questioning.
By pleading guilty, the defendant waived his right to challenge the court's Sandoval ruling (see, People v. Marinelli, 148 A.D.2d 550).
We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Brown, J.P., Rubin, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.