From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 15, 1994
202 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 15, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.).


The court properly determined, after conducting a limited inquiry, that there was no merit to defendant's challenge of the predicate felony statement, and that a hearing was thus not required (see, People v. Adams, 111 A.D.2d 397). Further, since the court fully considered and denied defendant's motion to withdraw his plea before defense counsel testified that he had not coerced defendant into pleading guilty, the defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel (People v. Rodriguez, 189 A.D.2d 684, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 892).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Asch, Rubin, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 15, 1994
202 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Green

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RODNEY GREEN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 15, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 470

Citing Cases

People v. Shomo

The court properly adjudicated defendant a persistent violent felony offender without conducting an…