From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gravesandy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1995
221 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 13, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reversing the conviction for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

As the People correctly concede, since criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree was not among the counts submitted to the jury at a prior trial on the indictment, resulting in a partial verdict, it was fundamental error for the court to submit that count to the jury at the instant trial (see, People v Williams, 133 A.D.2d 717, 718-719; People v Anderson, 111 A.D.2d 124).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see, People v Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10; People v Sanchez, 86 N.Y.2d 27). Thompson, J.P., Joy, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gravesandy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1995
221 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Gravesandy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PETER GRAVESANDY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 563

Citing Cases

Rivera v. Firetog

Thus, the retrial of the petitioner on that count is barred by principles of double jeopardy. In addition,…

People v. Lott

We reject that contention. Although "[a] single error may qualify as ineffective assistance [when such] . . .…