holding that "loss of enjoyment of life is not a separate element of damages deserving a distinct award but is, instead, only a factor to be considered by the jury in assessing damages for conscious pain and suffering"
Summary of this case from Golden Eagle Archery v. JacksonSubmitted December 12, 1988
Decided February 16, 1989
Motion to dismiss appeal denied.
holding that "loss of enjoyment of life is not a separate element of damages deserving a distinct award but is, instead, only a factor to be considered by the jury in assessing damages for conscious pain and suffering"
Summary of this case from Golden Eagle Archery v. JacksonFull title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES GLINTON…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 16, 1989
The proposed third cause of action seeks to recover damages for physical injuries, including pain and…
Golden Eagle Archery v. Jacksonability"); Fantozzi v. Sandusky Cement Prods. Co., 597 N.E.2d 474, 481-87 (Ohio 1992) (surveying decisions…