From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gilchrist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 17, 1996
231 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

September 17, 1996.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered January 31, 1996, resentencing defendant to a term of 5 to 15 years, upon his plea of guilty to attempted robbery in the first degree, unanimously modified, on the law, to reduce the sentence to 31/3 to 10 years, and otherwise affirmed.

Before: Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.


Defendant, who was improperly sentenced as a second violent felony offender to a term of 5 to 10 years ( People v Gilchrist, 223 AD2d 382), was improperly resentenced, as a firsttime felony offender, to a term of 5 to 15 years. Defendant had a reasonable expectation of finality in the 10-year maximum term originally imposed pursuant to his plea bargain ( see, Stewart v Scully, 925 F2d 58; People v Hoppie, 220 AD2d 528; cf., People v Spears, 228 AD2d 193), and the minimum period of imprisonment for a first-time attempted first-degree robbery offender at the time the instant offense was committed was onethird of the maximum term (Penal Law § 70.02 [b]; [2] [a]; [former (4)]). Inasmuch as the 15-year maximum term imposed by the sentencing court shows that it would not, if given another opportunity to sentence, impose a maximum term of less than 10 years, we modify the resentence to 31/3 to 10 years.


Summaries of

People v. Gilchrist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 17, 1996
231 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Gilchrist

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STANLEY GILCHRIST…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 17, 1996

Citations

231 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
647 N.Y.S.2d 77

Citing Cases

People v. White

02(1), which is not classified as a violent felony (Penal Law § 70.02[c]). We perceive no basis for a…

People v. Trimm

Defendant appeals, arguing, inter alia, that the higher maximum sentence violates the Double Jeopardy Clause…