From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gibbs

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 30, 1995
85 N.Y.2d 899 (N.Y. 1995)

Opinion

Decided March 30, 1995

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Richard B. Lowe, III, J.

Stanley Neustadter, New York City, for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney of New York County, New York City (Morrie I. Kleinbart of counsel), for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed for so much of the reasoning of the memorandum of the Appellate Division as concluded that "the permissive adverse inference charge given by the court was an appropriate exercise of discretion under the circumstances" ( 207 A.D.2d 288).

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK.


Summaries of

People v. Gibbs

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 30, 1995
85 N.Y.2d 899 (N.Y. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Gibbs

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRIS GIBBS, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 30, 1995

Citations

85 N.Y.2d 899 (N.Y. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 315
650 N.E.2d 1316

Citing Cases

Smith v. Artus

T. 456. Relying on People v. Gibbs, 85 N.Y.2d 899 (1995), the court advised defense counsel that it would…

People v. Simon

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the…