From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gehrig

Supreme Court of California
May 13, 1903
7 Cal. Unrep. 149 (Cal. 1903)

Opinion

          Commissioners’ Decision. Department 1. Appeal from Superior Court, Sierra County; Stanley A. Smith, Judge.

         Frank Gehrig was convicted of manslaughter, and he appeals. Affirmed.

          COUNSEL

          F. D. Soward and L. W. Fulkerth, for appellant.

          U.S. Webb, for the People.


          OPINION

          GRAY, C.

          In this case the defendant was convicted of manslaughter, and sentenced to 10 years’ confinement in the state prison. He appealed from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. He has filed no brief and made no appearance upon the appeal. The appeal is ‘submitted on the record’ without argument. Section 1253 of the Penal Code reads as follows: ‘The judgment may be affirmed if the appellant fail to appear, but can be reversed [7 Cal.Unrep. 150] only after argument, though the respondent fail to appear.’ Under this provision of the law but one disposition can be made of the case in its present condition: it can be affirmed. We therefore advise that the judgment and order appealed from the affirmed.

          We concur: HAYNES, C.; CHIPMAN, C.

          PER CURIAM.

          For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Gehrig

Supreme Court of California
May 13, 1903
7 Cal. Unrep. 149 (Cal. 1903)
Case details for

People v. Gehrig

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. GEHRIG.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: May 13, 1903

Citations

7 Cal. Unrep. 149 (Cal. 1903)
7 Cal. Unrep. 149

Citing Cases

PEOPLE v. LUSK

Under the law "but one disposition can be made of the case in its present condition; it can be affirmed." (…

In re Delmas

We should feel entirely justified in refusing to accede to such a demand even if the pressure of more…