From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEOPLE v. GEHM

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

May, 1927.


The order of filiation is reversed on the facts, on the ground that the finding of fact that the defendant Clarence Gehm is the father of the child born to Emma Ryder is against the evidence and contrary to the weight thereof. ( Drummond v. Dolan, 155 App. Div. 449; Drummond v. Zucker, 157 id. 728; Commissioner of Public Charities v. O'Keefe, 180 id. 667.) This court disapproves such finding. A new trial is ordered and the matter remitted to the Children's Court of the county of Broome. Van Kirk, Acting P.J., Hinman, McCann, Davis and Whitmyer, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

PEOPLE v. GEHM

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

PEOPLE v. GEHM

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CLARENCE GEHM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 1, 1927

Citations

220 App. Div. 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Citing Cases

Prewitt v. Hall

Hill v. Hiles, 309 Ill. App. 321, 32 N.E.2d 933; Steiner v. Rig-A-Jig Toy Co., 10 Ill. App.2d 410, at 421,…

Hill v. Hiles

Other cases in which such evidence has been held incompetent are: Ferry v. Louisville Ry. Co., 165 Ky. 747,…