From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gati

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1938
18 N.E.2d 35 (N.Y. 1938)

Summary

In People v. Gati (279 N.Y. 631) the precise question presented by this case was before this court and was the only point urged in the brief of defendant-appellant Gati. The proper objections and exceptions had been taken.

Summary of this case from People v. Hicks

Opinion

Argued October 11, 1938

Decided November 22, 1938

Appeal from the Court of General Sessions of New York County.

John McKim Minton, Jr., and Robert M. Davis for Salvatore Gati, appellant.

Erwin N. Schapira, Ralph J. Barra and Caesar B.F. Barra for Charles Sberna, appellant.

Thomas E. Dewey, District Attorney ( Felix C. Benvenga, Jacob J. Rosenblum and Charles C. Tillinghast, Jr., of counsel), for respondent.


As to each defendant: judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, HUBBS and FINCH, JJ.; LEHMAN, LOUGHRAN and RIPPEY, JJ., concur under section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.


Summaries of

People v. Gati

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1938
18 N.E.2d 35 (N.Y. 1938)

In People v. Gati (279 N.Y. 631) the precise question presented by this case was before this court and was the only point urged in the brief of defendant-appellant Gati. The proper objections and exceptions had been taken.

Summary of this case from People v. Hicks
Case details for

People v. Gati

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SALVATORE GATI and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 22, 1938

Citations

18 N.E.2d 35 (N.Y. 1938)
18 N.E.2d 35

Citing Cases

People v. Hicks

A jury finding an accused guilty of homicide in the commission of a felony can have no more difficulty in…

People v. Ertel

Even had the jury made a recommendation, it would not have been binding on the court. ( People v. Gati, 279…