From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gates

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Fifth Division
Aug 24, 1973
302 N.E.2d 470 (Ill. App. Ct. 1973)

Summary

In Gates, the prosecutor implied that if the defendant had been acting in self-defense he would have told the police of that defense instead of remaining silent.

Summary of this case from People v. Pickett

Opinion

No. 57566 Reversed and remanded.

August 24, 1973. Abstract of Decision

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. KENNETH R. WENDT, Judge, presiding.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, (Suzanne M. Kohut and Robert Gevirtz, Assistant Public Defenders, of counsel,) for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State's Attorney, of Chicago, (Kenneth L. Gillis and Patricia Campbell Bobb, Assistant State's Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.


Abstract of Decision


Summaries of

People v. Gates

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Fifth Division
Aug 24, 1973
302 N.E.2d 470 (Ill. App. Ct. 1973)

In Gates, the prosecutor implied that if the defendant had been acting in self-defense he would have told the police of that defense instead of remaining silent.

Summary of this case from People v. Pickett
Case details for

People v. Gates

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BENNIE F…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Fifth Division

Date published: Aug 24, 1973

Citations

302 N.E.2d 470 (Ill. App. Ct. 1973)
302 N.E.2d 470

Citing Cases

People v. Taylor

Here, as in Johnson, the evidence was overwhelming. To support his contention, the defendant relies heavily…

People v. Pickett

The error, if any, was harmless. • 8 Defendant, relying on People v. Gates (1973), 14 Ill. App.3d 367, 302…