From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Garcia

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 15, 1977
41 N.Y.2d 861 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued January 10, 1977

Decided February 15, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, IVAN WARNER, J.

Daniel J. Bernstein and William E. Hellerstein for appellant.

Mario Merola, District Attorney (Bruce M. Tenenbaum of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed on the opinion by Presiding Justice HAROLD A. STEVENS at the Appellate Division ( 51 A.D.2d 329).

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and COOKE. Judge FUCHSBERG dissents and votes to reverse in the following opinion.


In my judgment, the defendant was deprived of his fundamental right to a fair trial, both because (1) his privilege against self incrimination (NY Const, art I, § 6; US Const, 14th Amdt) was violated in the manner so well stated by Mr. Justice LOUIS J. CAPOZZOLI in his opinion for the two dissenters at the Appellate Division, and (2) because of the closing of the courtroom to the public during the testimony of Officer Ferrer solely on the per se ground that he was an undercover agent and without any demonstration of special circumstances such as, for instance, the "presence of other investigatory targets [which] posed a threat to the agent's life" (People v Hinton, 31 N.Y.2d 71, 75; US Const, 6th Amdt; see, also, People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 238). Reversal of the conviction and a new trial are therefore required.

Order affirmed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Garcia

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 15, 1977
41 N.Y.2d 861 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

People v. Garcia

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JULIO GARCIA, Also…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 15, 1977

Citations

41 N.Y.2d 861 (N.Y. 1977)
393 N.Y.S.2d 709
362 N.E.2d 260

Citing Cases

People v. Watson

Whether the prosecutor's summation warrants reversal is an issue that for the most part is unpreserved for…

People v. Vereen

However, courts that have considered this precise issue have declined to regard such a charge as prejudicial…