Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of conviction, an order denying a new trial, and an order denying a motion in arrest of judgment, in the Superior Court of the County of Napa. Wallace, J.
COUNSEL
W. F. Henning, for Appellant.
A. L. Hart, Attorney General, for Respondent.
OPINION
In Bank. The Court:
In People v. Kinsey , 51 Cal. 278, the Court said: " If there be a plea of 'not guilty,' and also a plea of former conviction or acquittal, the defendant is entitled to a verdict on each plea, and until there is such a verdict there can be no judgment of conviction; " and that case was followed in People v. Helbing , 8 P. C. L. J. 947.
In this case the defendant, in addition to the plea of not guilty, pleaded a former acquittal. The jury returned a verdict of manslaughter, and omitted to find upon the plea of former acquittal. The record does not disclose that the defendant withdrew or waived the defense of a former acquittal; but the Attorney-General contends that in the absence of anything appearing to the contrary the appellate Court must presume in support of the correctness of the judgment of the Court below that that defense was withdrawn or waived.
But we are not aware that the doctrine of presumptions has ever been carried to that length. To presume that a party had withdrawn or waived a defense which he had pleaded, simply because a jury had failed to find upon it, might lead to very serious consequences. The evidence in the case is not before us, and we can not know whether any attempt was made to establish that defense. But as we view the matter, it is immaterial whether there was or not. If the jury had found in favor of the people upon the plea of a former acquittal, and had failed to find upon the plea of not guilty, it does not seem probable that we would have been asked to presume in support of a judgment of conviction, that the defendant had withdrawn or waived his plea of not guilty.
It has been repeatedly held by this Court that the failure of a trial court to find upon all the issues raised by the pleadings was a sufficient ground for the reversal of a judgment. It has never been suggested in such cases that the failure to find upon all the issues would raise a presumption that those not found upon had been abandoned on the trial.
Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.