From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Frazier

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Oct 24, 1919
43 Cal.App. 762 (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)

Opinion

Crim. No. 481.

October 24, 1919.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Plumas County. J. O. Moncur, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in People v. Peck, ante, p. 638.

M. C. Kerr for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Chas. Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


This is a companion case to People v. Peck, ante, p. 638, [ 185 P. 881]. [1] On a separate trial this defendant was convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary for an indeterminate period. The appeal is from said judgment. No argument, either oral or written, has been submitted in this court in behalf of appellant. His counsel appeared at the time set for the hearing, but declined to make any argument. We have, nevertheless, examined the record and have found abundant evidence to support the verdict. It may be stated further that we have discovered no prejudicial error, and we know of no reason why we should disturb the conclusion reached in the trial court.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Frazier

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Oct 24, 1919
43 Cal.App. 762 (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
Case details for

People v. Frazier

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ELTON FRAZIER, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Oct 24, 1919

Citations

43 Cal.App. 762 (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
185 P. 886

Citing Cases

Simpson-Fell Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil Co.

Under this instrument plaintiffs got no greater right than Fikes himself had. Wells v. Heddenberg, 11 Texas…

R.J. Cardinal Co. v. Ritchie

Provisions have also been upheld which grant to one party the option to terminate the contract if…