From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Francischelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 10, 2003
303 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-04816

Argued January 16, 2003.

March 10, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), rendered May 15, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Spires, J.), of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony. Presiding Justice Prudenti has been substituted for the late Justice O'Brien (see 22 NYCRR 670.1[c]).

Andrew C. Fine, New York, N.Y. (Lorca Morello of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, James A. Dolan, and Eugene M. Guarino of counsel), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony. The showup identification was conducted in close temporal and geographic proximity to the crime (see People v. Ortiz, 90 N.Y.2d 533, 537; People v. Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541, 543), and the defendant was not handcuffed or restrained by the plainclothes officers who were with him (see People v. Brown, 181 A.D.2d 615).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

PRUDENTI, P.J., FEUERSTEIN, McGINITY and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Francischelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 10, 2003
303 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Francischelli

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. JAMES FRANCISCHELLI, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 10, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 447

Citing Cases

Francischelli v. Potter

On March 10, 2003, the Second Department rejected petitioner's claims and affirmed the judgment of…