From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Foust

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 2003
303 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1990-05127

March 31, 2003.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this court dated April 26, 1993 (People v. Foust, 129 A.D.2d 718), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered.

Richard Foust, Alden, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Anne C. Feigus of counsel), for respondent.

Jonathan C. Scott, Smithtown, N.Y., former appellate counsel.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., DAVID S. RITTER, FRED T. SANTUCCI, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745).

PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI and ALTMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Foust

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 2003
303 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Foust

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. RICHARD FOUST, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 31, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 462

Citing Cases

People v. Foust

On March 31, 2003, the Appellate Division denied Defendant's second motion for coram nobis relief on the…