From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ferrance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 3, 1998
247 A.D.2d 204 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

Decided February 3, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.).


As the People concede, the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to detain defendant pending an identification by the eyewitness. Defendant's clothing was sharply at variance from the description of the suspect, and there was insufficient spatial or temporal proximity between the detention and the crime as well as a lack of suspicious circumstances (see, People v. Brown, 215 A.D.2d 333, lv withdrawn 86 N.Y.2d 791). Defendant is therefore entitled to suppression of the showup identification and a remand for an independent source hearing as well as a new trial (People v. Burts, 78 N.Y.2d 20).

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Ferrance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 3, 1998
247 A.D.2d 204 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Ferrance

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RUPERT FERRANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 204 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
667 N.Y.S.2d 754

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

Therefore, the stop of the livery cab by the police cannot be justified on these grounds. (Matter of Rubin…

People v. Thomas

Therefore, the stop of the livery cab by the police can not be justified on these grounds. In re Rubin M.,…