From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ferguson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 23, 1998
249 A.D.2d 168 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 23, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.).


Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The observation by officers, who were members of a special unit investigating crime against taxi drivers, of the livery cab in which defendant was a passenger being driven erratically through traffic and between double parked cars, at an excessive speed for the area, with one of the back seat passengers leaning over the front seat of the cab in an unusual manner, provided reasonable suspicion that the driver of the cab was the victim of an ongoing or imminent robbery ( People v. Brantley, 235 A.D.2d 546; People v. Heron, 185 A.D.2d 859, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 1027). Thus, the stop of the taxi cab was justified. We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Tom, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Ferguson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 23, 1998
249 A.D.2d 168 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Ferguson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY FERGUSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 23, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 168 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 254

Citing Cases

People v. Valentine

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. The observation by anti-crime unit officers of a…

People v. Thomas

Rivas (supra), the taxi was observed flashing its high beams and weaving from one lane to another, which gave…