From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fauntleroy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 21, 2004
8 A.D.3d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

1996-10107.

Decided June 21, 2004.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this court dated February 22, 1999 ( People v. Fauntleroy, 258 A.D.2d 664), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 15, 1996.

Kareem Fauntleroy, Pine City, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Cynthia Kean of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, SONDRA MILLER, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 377).

RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, S. MILLER and LUCIANO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Fauntleroy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 21, 2004
8 A.D.3d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Fauntleroy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. KAREEM FAUNTLEROY, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 21, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 708

Citing Cases

Fauntleroy v. Artuz

The Appellate Division denied the application on June 21, 2004, finding that Fauntleroy failed to establish…