From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fanning

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 29, 1949
89 N.E.2d 881 (N.Y. 1949)

Opinion

Submitted November 28, 1949

Decided December 29, 1949

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, GOLDSTEIN, J.

John Fanning, appellant in person.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Edgar J. Nathan, 3d, and Whitman Knapp of counsel), for respondent.


The defendant's petition does not sufficiently allege a case of fraudulent use of perjured testimony by the prosecuting attorney to warrant relief by a coram nobis proceeding. The order should be affirmed.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and BROMLEY, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Fanning

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 29, 1949
89 N.E.2d 881 (N.Y. 1949)
Case details for

People v. Fanning

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN FANNING, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 29, 1949

Citations

89 N.E.2d 881 (N.Y. 1949)
89 N.E.2d 881

Citing Cases

People v. Yamin

Savvides is not factually significant since it was established that a promise had in fact been made to a…

People v. Robertson

The fact that the confession was given in the evening at a different place does not make immaterial the proof…