From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fanelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 2004
8 A.D.3d 296 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-00528.

Decided June 1, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), rendered December 12, 2001, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the first degree and criminal mischief in the third degree, upon his guilty plea, and imposing sentence.

Salvatore C. Adamo, Patchogue, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Douglas A. Spencer of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, BARRY A. COZIER, ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's sentence was part of a negotiated plea agreement. Accordingly, he has no basis to complain that the sentence was excessive ( see People v. Coolbaugh, 129 A.D.2d 584; People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those set forth in his supplemental pro se brief, either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

KRAUSMAN, J.P., LUCIANO, COZIER and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Fanelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 2004
8 A.D.3d 296 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Fanelli

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. FRANK FANELLI, A/K/A DOMINIC FANELLI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 296 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
777 N.Y.S.2d 320

Citing Cases

People v. Vere

Here, although the County Court did not warn the defendant during the plea allocution that he would be…

People v. Yarborough

To the extent the defendant contends that his counsel was ineffective such that the voluntariness of his plea…