From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Estrada

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1991
173 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Summary

holding that dismissal of a returned fugitive's appeal "would be inappropriate," because he had become "amenable to the jurisdiction of this court" while his appeal was pending

Summary of this case from Taveras v. Smith

Opinion

May 13, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Initially, we reject the People's contention that this appeal should be dismissed because the defendant had absconded and was not amenable to the jurisdiction of the court at the time the notice of appeal was filed on his behalf. Several months after the notice of appeal was filed the sentence imposed was carried into execution. Since that time the defendant has been amenable to the jurisdiction of this court (cf., Molinaro v New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365; People v Sullivan, 28 N.Y.2d 900, appeal reinstated 28 N.Y.2d 992, affd 29 N.Y.2d 552), and has indicated a desire to pursue his appeal (cf., People v Jinks, 140 A.D.2d 371). Thus, dismissal of the appeal would be inappropriate.

The defendant contends that the evidence adduced was legally and factually insufficient to support his conviction for attempted burglary in the second degree. We disagree. The defendant was observed on the second floor landing of a fire escape, outside a bedroom window which had been tampered with. The explanation he gave for his presence was highly implausible, and when ordered to leave the premises, he did so in a way which evidenced a consciousness of guilt. Viewing this evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant attempted to knowingly enter the complainant's home unlawfully with intent to commit a crime therein (see, Penal Law § 140.25; § 110.00). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Eiber and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Estrada

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1991
173 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

holding that dismissal of a returned fugitive's appeal "would be inappropriate," because he had become "amenable to the jurisdiction of this court" while his appeal was pending

Summary of this case from Taveras v. Smith

finding it "inappropriate" to dismiss appeal on fugitive disentitlement grounds where defendant was a fugitive when the notice of appeal was filed but was thereafter made "amenable to the jurisdiction of this court" and had "indicated a desire to pursue his appeal"

Summary of this case from Taveras v. Smith
Case details for

People v. Estrada

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JORGE ESTRADA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 13, 1991

Citations

173 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
570 N.Y.S.2d 150

Citing Cases

Taveras v. Smith

While it is not necessary to address the issue, it appears that there is no "automatic" dismissal rule in New…

Taveras v. Smith

" (quoting People v. Sullivan, 28 N.Y.2d 900, 901, 322 N.Y.S.2d 730, 271 N.E.2d 561 (1971) and citing…