From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Escala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 2, 1987
128 A.D.2d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

March 2, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the evidence was of sufficient quality and quantity to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant's claim that he was prejudiced by the prosecutor's reference in his opening statement and attempted reference in his examination of a witness to a quantity of money found on the defendant at his arrest is without merit. While the reference was improper (see, People v. Lizzarra, 70 A.D.2d 572; People v. Jones, 62 A.D.2d 356), any possible prejudice arising therefrom was cured by the court's preliminary instructions and jury charge, which informed the jury that neither statements of the attorneys nor unanswered questions are evidence. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Escala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 2, 1987
128 A.D.2d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Escala

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. AUGUSTO ESCALA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 2, 1987

Citations

128 A.D.2d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Wells

Defendant's possible intent to sell drugs was a key element of one of the charged crimes (see, Penal Law §…

People v. Reid

Similarly unavailing is the defendant's claim that he was deprived of a fair trial by allegedly improper…