From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Earnest

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1872
45 Cal. 29 (Cal. 1872)

Opinion

         Appeal from the County Court of Butte County.

         COUNSEL

          P. O. Hundley, for Appellant.

          The Attorney General, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         By the Court:

         The statute (Hitt., Secs. 3918, 3919) requires that a copy of the order of the Court for the summoning of a Grand Jury should be delivered to the Sheriff and that it shall be the duty of that officer to summon the Grand Jury " upon the receipt of the order," etc. In this case the only order delivered to the Sheriff was an order to summon twenty-four persons to serve as trial jurors. This trial jury was subsequently impaneled by the Court as a Grand Jury and found the indictment upon which the prisoner was convicted, and his motion to set aside the indictment duly made on that ground, was denied. Had a subpoena been issued to summon twenty-four witnesses in the case there would have been just as much authority in the Court to impanel them as a Grand Jury as to impanel this trial jury as a Grand Jury.

         Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to set aside the indictment and for such further proceedings as may be proper.


Summaries of

People v. Earnest

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1872
45 Cal. 29 (Cal. 1872)
Case details for

People v. Earnest

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE v. W. B. EARNEST

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1872

Citations

45 Cal. 29 (Cal. 1872)

Citing Cases

In re Gannon

(Commonwealth v. McComb , 56 Pa. St. 365.)          The panel of either may be challenged for irregularities…