From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Diaz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 22, 1992
80 N.Y.2d 950 (N.Y. 1992)

Opinion

Decided October 22, 1992


Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Joseph Cerbone, J. Milton Zelermyer, New York City, and Philip L. Weinstein for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney of Bronx County, Bronx (Adrienne Brewington of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Trained narcotics officers driving through a drug-prone neighborhood spotted defendant clutching a plastic bag tightly against his body. These circumstances, although not necessarily indicative of criminality, justified the officers' initial approach for the purposes of asking defendant to identify himself and state his purpose in the neighborhood (see, People v De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210). That one officer held his hand on his holstered gun as he approached defendant was not, by itself, sufficient to raise the encounter to a second-level investigatory stop under De Bour, and defendant intentionally abandoned the plastic bag and fled before the officers had any opportunity to ask him any questions. Accordingly, the courts below correctly denied defendant's motion to suppress.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur; Judge SMITH taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Diaz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 22, 1992
80 N.Y.2d 950 (N.Y. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. IGNACIO DIAZ, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 22, 1992

Citations

80 N.Y.2d 950 (N.Y. 1992)
590 N.Y.S.2d 871
605 N.E.2d 358

Citing Cases

People v. Weaver

The officer did not display a weapon. We conclude that the officer was entitled to approach the group to…

People v. Reyes

The closeness of the officers did not preclude the finding that the questions were a first level request for…