Opinion
August 7, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lagana, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We do not reach the merits of the defendant's claims of an improper prosecutorial summation and errors in the charge as these claims are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245; People v. Allen, 135 A.D.2d 823; People v. Jalah, 107 A.D.2d 762) and under the circumstances, review in the interest of justice is not warranted. We note, however, that while the prosecutor did make one improper comment during cross-examination of the defendant, it was harmless (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230).
Finally, we see no reason to disturb the defendant's sentence (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.