From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Diaz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 28, 2000
270 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

March 28, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ira Globerman, J.), rendered April 2, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree and conspiracy in the second degree, and sentencing him to consecutive terms of 25 years to life and 8-1/3 to 25 years, unanimously affirmed.

Elizabeth F. Bernhardt, for respondent.

Pamela Peters, for defendant-appellant.

NARDELLI, J.P., WILLIAMS, TOM, LERNER, FRIEDMAN, JJ.


This matter was remanded to the trial court by our order enteredJune 29, 1999 ( 262 A.D.2d 255 ) for a reconstruction hearing on the issue of whether four prospective jurors were excused for cause notwithstanding the notation that they were excused on consent. The trial court conducted the hearing on October 22, 1999, at which prior defense counsel and the trial Assistant District Attorney testified. The court, relying also on its own documentation and recall, found that the jurors were clearly excused for cause, but that out of deference to those jurors' possible sensitivities, the court had read out, and the clerk recorded, that they were excused on consent rather than for cause (see, e.g., People v. Robinson, 249 A.D.2d 115 lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 859;People v. Childs, 247 A.D.2d 319, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 849). The transcript of the reconstruction hearing supports that finding, especially insofar as those potential jurors either were, or were related to, law enforcement personnel. Nor do we find any basis to disturb the court's findings. As we have recently noted, such excusals are "in the nature of an uncontested excusal for cause, and thus defendant could not have made a meaningful contribution" to any of the sidebar discussions with the jurors (People v. Garcia, 265 A.D.2d 171, 697 N.Y.S.2d 8). As such, defendant's Antommarchi claim is meritless. The challenge to the corroboration charge is unpreserved (People v. James, 75 N.Y.2d 874). In any event, that, and the remaining claims, also are meritless.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Diaz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 28, 2000
270 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Borys Diaz…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 28, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
706 N.Y.S.2d 23

Citing Cases

Diaz v. Herbert

On appeal, the Appellate Division affirmed Diaz's conviction. See People v. Diaz, 706 N.Y.S.2d 23 (App.Div.…

People v. Duran

In any event, the record establishes a valid waiver of defendant's right to be present at sidebar conferences…