From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dendel

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jun 19, 2008
481 Mich. 1201 (Mich. 2008)

Summary

noting that a trial court's determination regarding Strickland prejudice is reviewed de novo on appeal and that the test for prejudice is an objective one to which appellate courts should not simply defer to the trial court

Summary of this case from People v. Trowbridge

Opinion

No. 132042.

June 19, 2008.

Court of Appeals No. 247391.


Orders Entered June 19, 2008:

In this cause, the parties' joint motion for rehearing is considered and, in lieu of granting rehearing, it is ordered that the opinion of the Court and the judgment order are amended to provide that the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the remaining issues raised on appeal.


Summaries of

People v. Dendel

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jun 19, 2008
481 Mich. 1201 (Mich. 2008)

noting that a trial court's determination regarding Strickland prejudice is reviewed de novo on appeal and that the test for prejudice is an objective one to which appellate courts should not simply defer to the trial court

Summary of this case from People v. Trowbridge

explaining that other jurisdictions have rejected the argument that defense counsel provided ineffective assistance where counsel followed his client's instructions

Summary of this case from People v. Greene
Case details for

People v. Dendel

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KATHERINE SUE…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jun 19, 2008

Citations

481 Mich. 1201 (Mich. 2008)

Citing Cases

People v. Nickerson

In order to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must satisfy the two-part…

People v. Young

court's factual findings for clear error and reviews de novo questions of constitutional law. People v…