Opinion
No. 121611.
March 11, 2003.
SC: 121611, COA: 239413, Muskegon CC: 00-045011-FH
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the May 21, 2002 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Cavanagh and Kelly, JJ., would hold this case in abeyance for Tesmer v. Granholm, 295 F.3d 536 (CA 6, 2002), vacated and rehearing en banc ordered, 307 F.3d 459 (CA 6, 2002).