From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dell'orfano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 10, 1995
217 A.D.2d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

July 10, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.).


Ordered that the amended sentence is affirmed.

In March 1989 the defendant was initially sentenced as a persistent felony offender to an indeterminate term of 20 years to life imprisonment. Thereafter, by decision and order dated October 12, 1993, this Court remitted the matter to the Supreme Court pursuant to Penal Law § 70.10 (2) to set forth on the record the reasons why it was "of the opinion that the history and character of the defendant and the nature and circumstances of his criminal conduct indicate[d] that extended incarceration and life-time supervision [would] best serve the public interest" (People v. Dell'Orfano, 197 A.D.2d 587). At the proceeding which followed, the Trial Judge, in complying with this Court's order, stated on the record that he found the defendant to be a persistent violent felony offender and that he was imposing the same sentence originally imposed "by reason of the fact that he is a persistent violent felony offender".

The context in which the proceeding occurred as well as the record clearly indicate that in sentencing the defendant as a persistent violent felony offender, instead of a persistent felony offender the Trial Judge merely misspoke (see, People v Wright, 56 N.Y.2d 613). There would have been no need for the court to state its reasons why it was of the opinion that, inter alia, the history and character of the defendant warranted extended incarceration and lifetime supervision, if he had been sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender (Penal Law § 70.08). We additionally stress that the sentence which was imposed was a lawful one for a persistent felony offender pursuant to Penal Law § 70.10 (2); § 70.00 (2).

We further conclude that the adjudication of the defendant as a persistent felony offender was justified by his lengthy history of arrests, convictions, incarcerations, and violent acts (see, People v. Terry, 117 A.D.2d 761). Balletta, J.P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Dell'orfano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 10, 1995
217 A.D.2d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Dell'orfano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN DELL'ORFANO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 10, 1995

Citations

217 A.D.2d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
629 N.Y.S.2d 88

Citing Cases

People v. Staton

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we…

People v. Garcia

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the resentencing court complied with the mandates of Penal Law §…