From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Delee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1984
106 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

December 3, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D'Amaro, J.).


Judgment affirmed. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5).

The trial court incorrectly instructed the jury that the defense set forth in subdivision 1 of section 155.15 Penal of the Penal Law of a "claim of right made in good faith" was an affirmative defense (see People v. Chesler, 50 N.Y.2d 203; People v Ricchiuti, 93 A.D.2d 842). This charge was given at defendant's request, however, and, therefore, he has waived his right to complain (see United States v. Moon, 718 F.2d 1210, cert den ___ US ___, 104 S Ct 2344; People v. Ford, 62 N.Y.2d 275).

Furthermore, we note that the testimony of both the victim and defendant was sufficient to establish that the market value of the stolen property was at least $250. Accordingly, the trial court properly submitted a charge of grand larceny in the third degree to the jury. Titone, J.P., Lazer, Bracken and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Delee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1984
106 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Delee

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES DELEE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 1984

Citations

106 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Waytes

In such circumstances, a general instruction on the definition of the elements of sodomy in the first degree,…

People v. Miller

It was not error per se for the Supreme Court to instruct prospective jurors on the law of acting in concert…