From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dejesus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 2005
19 A.D.3d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2003-10851.

June 27, 2005.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), rendered November 6, 2003, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Stephen J. Pittari, White Plains, N.Y. (Jacqueline F. Oliva of counsel), for appellant.

Jeanine Pirro, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Thomas K. Chong and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the challenged identification procedure was merely confirmatory ( see People v. Rodriguez, 79 NY2d 445; People v. Wharton, 74 NY2d 921). Thus, the notice and hearing requirements of CPL 710.30 were inapplicable ( see People v. Kahley, 214 AD2d 960).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Dejesus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 2005
19 A.D.3d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Dejesus

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BILLY DEJESUS, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 27, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
797 N.Y.S.2d 297

Citing Cases

People v. Vasquez

The evidence adduced at trial revealed, inter alia, that the defendant was present at a meeting when plans to…

People v. Feola

Thus the prosecution's failure to give statutory notice had no meritorious or qualitative effect on the…