From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Decker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 6, 2008
51 A.D.3d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2005-03236.

May 6, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered March 31, 2005, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ronald L. Kuby, New York, N.Y. (David Pressman of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Anne Grady of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and Leventhal, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment based on pre-indictment delay ( see People v Vernace, 96 NY2d 886; People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442; People v Jones, 267 AD2d 250; People v Brown, 209 AD2d 233).

The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in excluding evidence that another party may have committed the crime for which the defendant was being tried, as the evidence was purely speculative and would have caused undue delay, prejudice, and confusion ( see People v Olibencia, 45 AD3d 607). The defendant's constitutional argument with respect to the court's exclusion of this evidence is not preserved for appellate review, and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see People v Olibencia, 45 AD3d 607).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Decker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 6, 2008
51 A.D.3d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Decker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WAYNE DECKER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 6, 2008

Citations

51 A.D.3d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 4368
855 N.Y.S.2d 910

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Such evidence or argument that an unidentified third party may have committed the shooting was purely…

People v. Martin Nagel

Under the unique circumstances presented here, we agree. Although defendant failed to preserve his contention…