From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1976
51 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

March 1, 1976


Appeal by defendant (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 4, 1973, convicting him of attempted murder and criminal possession of dangerous weapons, etc., as a felony, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence and (2) (by permission) from an order of the same court, entered December 10, 1974, which, after a hearing, denied his motion to set aside the verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and new trial ordered. Appeal from the order dismissed as academic in view of our disposition on the appeal from the judgment. It was improper for the Assistant District Attorney to intimate to the jury that vital evidence was being withheld from it because of the rules of evidence (see People v Jackson, 7 N.Y.2d 142; People v Wilson, 40 A.D.2d 839), as well as to dwell excessively on the seriousness of the stepdaughter's injuries in order to excite the jury to take vengeance upon the defendant. Christ, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur; Martuscello, Acting P.J., and Hawkins, J., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment and order.


Summaries of

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1976
51 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

People v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIE DAVIS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1976

Citations

51 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

People v. Carter

This was improper. (People v Davis, 51 A.D.2d 974; People v Wilson, 40 A.D.2d 839, 840.) It is unnecessary…

People v. Cannon

The prejudicial nature of this mistake was further compounded by the trial court's statement that it had…