From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Daum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted November 28, 2000.

December 27, 2000.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered February 3, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts) and robbery in the second degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Johanna G. Hendrix, Staten Island, N.Y., for appellant.

William L. Murphy, District Attorney, Staten Island, N Y (Jonathan J. Silbermann and Jillian S. Harrington of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., HOWARD MILLER, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he was denied his right to be present at all material stages of the trial is without merit (see, People v. Washington, 246 A.D.2d 676, 677; People v. DelRio, 220 A.D.2d 122, 132).

Moreover, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in permitting the People to amend the indictment prior to trial. The amendment did not change the theory of the prosecution, and the defendant failed to present "evidence of any viable defense he was forced to forego or how he was otherwise misled to his detriment by the amendment" (People v. Hartman, 123 A.D.2d 883; see, People v. Gilbert, 142 A.D.2d 686, 687; see also, CPL 200.70; People v. Ames, 115 A.D.2d 543).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 85-86).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Daum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Daum

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. TERRANCE DAUM, APPELLANT. (IND. NO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 644

Citing Cases

People v. Peterson

Similarly unavailing are the defendant's contentions regarding the amendment of the indictment ( seeCPL…

People v. Larrymore

The amendment did not change the People's theory of the prosecution, and served simply to conform the…