From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dao

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 12, 2004
9 A.D.3d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2001-07479.

July 12, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Brown, J.), dated July 18, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Before: H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.


The County Court's designation of the defendant as a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act was supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see Correction Law art 6-C; People v. Smith, 5 AD3d 752, lv denied 3 NY3d 602; People v. Moore, 1 AD3d 421, lv denied 2 NY3d 743; People v. Brooks, 308 AD2d 99).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Dao

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 12, 2004
9 A.D.3d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Dao

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DONG V. DAO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 12, 2004

Citations

9 A.D.3d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
779 N.Y.S.2d 914

Citing Cases

People v. Mingo

We affirm. The People bear the burden of proving the facts supporting a SORA determination by "clear and…

People v. Villane

The Supreme Court designated the defendant a level three sex offender "[b]ased upon all the facts and…